I began the day yesterday on the steps of the Michigan Union at the University of Michigan Ann Arbor, at 2am- 50 years to the moment when Senator John F. Kennedy arrived to an awaiting throng of 10,000 students and gave a brief but impassioned address which marked the beginning of what would become the Peace Corps. Kennedy challenged U-M students, in what would become the signature line of his Inaugural address, to ask what they could do for their country, not what their country could do for them.
“How many of you who are going to be doctors, are willing to spend your days in Ghana? Technicians or engineers, how many of you are willing to work in the Foreign Service and spend your lives traveling around the world? On your willingness to do that, not merely to serve one year or two years in the service, but on your willingness to contribute part of your life to this country, I think will depend the answer whether a free society can compete. I think it can! And I think Americans are willing to contribute. But the effort must be far greater than we have ever made in the past.”
Kennedy issued a challenge to a generation urning to be asked. And U-M students led their generation in responding. Within 10 months of Kennedy’s Michigan Union speech, the first Peace Corps volunteers were deployed overseas.
As the world has changed over the last 50 years and become more interconnected, inherent barriers to entry for making a difference have been lowered- abroad and at home. A young person looking to give back now has more opportunities, indeed a menu of options, locations, durations and experiences to serve.
Technology and social media have helped to make the world smaller. And while they will never replace face-to-face (I disagree with the suggestion that it is a zero-sum comparison), they undeniably have opened up the world to those who never before had the platform to voice their opinions, join a conversation or contribute in small ways to take action and create change.
Across sectors and industries, Millennials are demonstrating that what used to be accomplished by a small amount of people- the elected, appointed, entitled, connected- can now just as well, if not better, be accomplished by a large amount of people- all of us- giving the time, money or talent that we have. The idea is that the sum of the parts are larger than the whole itself.
I traveled from Michigan to the campus of the University of Maryland College Park to participate in a discussion on whether Social Media is a “Game Changer or a World Changer,” to bring this point home: in the 21st century we can all be citizen activists, using new tools to connect, exchange ideas, collaborative, and make a difference. In the 21st century, we have open access to information- data- that drive decision-making and problem-solving.
Recently, Malcolm Gladwell made a provocative statement in The New Yorker, in which he claimed that social media has contributed to the death of activism. He insisted that technology doesn’t build relationships- it breaks them, and that young people today are not as connected to causes and issues as prior generations- specifically referencing the Civil Rights movement.
( I was interviewed by the Chronicle of Philanthropy shortly after the article was published and offered a rebuttal to Gladwell’s charges in a podcast)
I wish Gladwell had been in Michigan this week. He would have seen his argument fall on its face. No one is saying that Facebook likes and Twitter followers are going to bring about world peace or an end to world hunger. What we are saying, and what the discussion about the future of international service kept harkening back to, is how we are going to leverage these tools- this inherent interconnectedness- to accomplish our mission and goals better.
Lowering the barrier to entry should never be discounted. Openness and participation by all, not a few, is a paradigm shift. It should be embraced.
Service builds leadership and civic skills that result in a more engaged citizenry. It is a domino effect that ripples across sectors, and across a lifetime. Still, the individual impact is far less than the cummulative impact- the combined whole of individual parts.
It is this concept that defines the 2.0 world in which we live, and that is the building block for myImpact.org and our efforts to leverage social media to engage more Americans in service, demonstrate the effectiveness of service programs and advance service as a solution to societal problems- at the community, national and international levels.